Consumer Watchdog Takes ‘Do Not Track Me’ Campaign to Times Square With Animated Video Targeting Google CEO’s Lack of …

September 2nd, 2010

Consumer Watchdog Takes ‘Do Not Track Me’ Campaign to Times Square With Animated Video Targeting Google CEO’s Lack of …
SANTA MONICA, Calif., Sept. 2 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Consumer Watchdog’s InsideGoogle.com has taken its online privacy campaign to New York’s Times Square, where it has purchased a 540 sq. ft. Jumbotron digital advertisement promoting an animated video satirizing Google CEO Eric Schmidt’s attitude toward consumer privacy.

Read more on PR Newswire via Yahoo! News

Consumer Protection: It’s Your Job, Too

August 29th, 2010

Which authority is responsible for ensuring that the products we buy are safe, FDA, CPSC, or NHTSA? None of them. Although these three organizations are the most important for defining and monitoring reports on the shortcomings of provisions in many different products, no government agency is “responsible” to ensure product safety. Everyone must play its role, including you.

The role of governments in protecting consumer

government arrangements, with the absolute minimum, should that product manufacturers to ensure that their products are represented fairly safe for the sale and consumption. The three agencies responsible for regulating most products that lead to serious injury or death, the FDA (Food and Drug Administration), CPSC (Consumer Product Safety Commission) and NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration). The FDA regulates food, drugs, cosmetics and medical devices. The CPSC regulates consumer the most common, including toys, tools and furniture. NHTSA regulates vehicles and related equipment.

In general, if the government has set standards, its main role is to collect information from consumer reports, explore, and passing to the constructor. A government agency can initiate a manufacturer recall, when the reports or studies show that this is a serious problem with a product, but manufacturers are encouraged to remember when they embark on the knowledge of a dangerous product.

The role of manufacturers in the consumer

Manufacturers have the greatest role in ensuring consumer safety. One manufacturer has developed a product that creates the product, the product labels. Consequently, they are best qualified to design defects, manufacturing or labeling, which could cause serious injuries on the ground. Consequently, manufacturers are often responsible for defects in a unique position to have on the site. Many times, manufacturers have the stain of error, but decided to continue to market or marketing a product in the hope of benefit, despite the default.

Their role in protecting consumers

You and other consumers to play a very important role to protect themselves and others against dangerous products. You do not have contact with a product before buying it, if your role in consumer protection began to purchase. Only buy products from companies you trust to take reasonable steps to ensure your protection. This point is crucial because it allows security is good business and helps the manufacturer to be strict in monitoring their own products.

If you have a home product, you protect yourself and your family. Read all instructions before using the product and use it only as directed. Make sure each piece has a product listed in the instructions and do not have a product with missing parts. Keep dangerous products out of reach of children.

If you have a loved one has suffered injuries ore in connection with dangerous consumer products, there is more you can do to protect others. First, make sure that an injury to the competent supervisory authority and the manufacturer is reported, both of which can correlate your wounds with other hazardous materials must be distinguished from isolated accidents.

And you should also consider a complaint against the product liability of the manufacturer. Product liability claims may be paid not only your medical expenses, lost wages and compensation for you because of your injury: They are forcing manufacturers to pay the full cost of your injury in terms of experience, they understand. product liability lawsuits do not profitable to sell dangerous products. They also reported recalls dangerous, and others can avoid the suffering of your injuries.

To learn more about the litigation of product liability and consumer protection, visit the website of Gary Starnes, Attorney at Chattanooga, Tennessee to visit.

Research and Markets: UK Protection 2010 – Identify Lucrative Consumer Segment Opportunities for Providers

August 25th, 2010

Research and Markets: UK Protection 2010 – Identify Lucrative Consumer Segment Opportunities for Providers
DUBLIN–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Research and Markets (http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/1a6823/uk_protection_2010) has announced the addition of the “UK Protection 2010″ report to their offering. UK Protection 2010 – Identify Lucrative Consumer Segment Opportunities for Providers The protection market will see improvements at a time when the economy is at a pivotal …

Read more on Business Wire

Consumer Protection in Oaxaca, Mexico: a Case Study

August 21st, 2010

Alvin Starkman M. A., LL. B.

 

 

 

Procuraduría Federal del Consumidor (PROFECO) is Mexico’s Federal Office of Fair Trading, you are closer to American or Canadian style of government can obtain a consumer Mediation Office and administered by the system. Regional Office of the State of Oaxaca is located in a relatively fast and efficient to run, meaning that it seems easy to use from the perspective of an appeal against Expat trade and business in the State and other abroad. Of course, it is however subject to limitations and peculiarities, which we are accustomed.

 

I bought a hot water heating Hidro Electrica, SA de CV (HESA), which was to my surprise came with a guarantee of eight years. Usually you buy in Oaxaca products manufactured or assembled with a 30 day warranty. In the odd case, he was for three months (extended warranties are rarely possible, as are the manufacturers and insurers, lack of proper quality control in production in Mexico). Normally, the widget stops in a week after widgeting … be it a washing machine, microwave, TV, or long-life bulbs.

 

After about a year on one side of the leak fuel boiler HESA, then followed some months later, on the other side. After six months and several phone calls to my dealer, Tubos y Conexiones the HESA authorized mechanic with two pairs of replacement tanks came, not with tanks of equipment that I bought was coordinated. “Do not worry,” assured Roberto. “I’ll put the cars right, they have in stock, simply choose one of two sets of time that your heater is at least functional.”

 

Whenever something you sign when satisfied with the service or product will not be complete, you qualify your confirmation. It helps if you use the resources PROFECO. “Temporary solution until the arrival of tanks elite stainless steel, I say at work. Everything seems to be made in writing as gospel in Oaxaca, therefore considered as an almost irrefutable evidence. Just ask anyone who is in prison for two years in detention, crime based on little more than newspaper clippings activities alleged.

 

During the next year, I traveled regularly Conexiones y Tubos, each time pleading with my partner Boneque the branch manager to help me in the right tanks went wrong before the exchange. Boneque was cooperative, in fact, while it allowed me to become the service HESA a real pain, discomfort and lack of resolution of their assembly. Hilda, the representative of Oaxaca HESA, the company had left, and Roberto service man did not accept the job from the manufacturer.

 

Three or four e-mail service to HESA remained unanswered, HESA in the news, as well as his chief engineer left. Hearing “Mr. Levin will call you back within 15 minutes “until then, not with this level of confidence in the company I was looking for.

 

With my contract and warranty booklet, copies of e-mail, confirmation of qualified and notes of any communication or an attempt to reach a settlement at all in hand, I was stuck in the office a friend, litigator Lic Edna Franco: “Do not worry my expenses Alvin. My concern is that the demand for a value of less than 15,000 pesos, the out-of-pocket kill you. PROFECO for … I tell all my clients to keep me before. ”

 

Oaxaca is not a small claims court, which means that regardless of the value of the peso in your request your costs the same, may, subject to the drafting of a will dealing with your lawyer for Pricing reduced. Edna has informed me that the action by the court on your own, even for a trial counsel old Canadian, is an almost impossible task. Therefore PROFECO is the way to go, given the fact that using your position to discharge their mandates and guidelines, and your will, a mediation of the state.

 

The offices of Oaxaca PROFECO are well endowed, but from a relatively small percentage of the population used, which means that government offices transportation, immigration and tax policy in comparison, for example, that Fresh air is a welcome and useful. Taken review your documents and advise what, if anything is missing, and how many copies are needed. Your Senior Advisor then reviews your documents, ask for clarification, and prepare an application package. Feel free to adjust the information of his choice accompany your application to complete the proposal, to include additional documentation that you may have. Remember that it may be appropriate and helpful, as they also appear to apparently there is still an employee of Oaxaca: “Is it OK if we also make copies of these notes I made last year I asked. More evidence.

 

My first 11 September 2008, participation has completed a trial date as I negotiated my schedule, to answer 10 October 2008. “You know,” advised Aurea Guzman Palacios, “you should also get your name retailers Tubos y Conexiones, as a defendant, even if, as he did not do something seems wrong.” I want to get a client with another case have!

 

“We’ll take care of serving, but remember, make sure by 10 hours on Oct. 10 strong.” In Toronto, we are used to give 15 minutes of grace, because it could be, that to start the Oaxaca government, could take a more rigorous and demanding schedule?

 

Service of process and notice of the date is done by the regional office PROFECO, where the company operates. In the case meant the HESA in the State of Mexico.

 

A Tubos Conexiones representatives attended, arriving shortly before the scheduled time. HESA is a no show. The mediator PROFECO Javier, the so-called Estado de México PROFECO Process Server, and it was noted that HESA has not been released because company employees were on strike and closed the plant. The officer was skeptical, he shows me that employees of government, sometimes for work, or simply can not be bothered to remember and stories. But in this case, we should give them the benefit of the doubt and just ask, once again trying to use the material with a return date costs, one month on the road. November 10th has been set for the new date, developed with more documentation, including the preamble to the circumstances of the postponement.

 

Before conceding that are not PROFECO HESA should, in the presence of the mediator and the engineer Javier Octavio Tubos representative, I called the offices of HESA. Lorena Torres, reception told me that the workers not on strike or if they had been in the recent past, and society in its normal functioning. So much for the credibility of the State of Mexico PROFECO Process Server.

 

PROFECO levies a fine on an undertaking for any missed appointment, the increase in volume, not on every visit. If HESA to visit the next day after receiving notice that the fine would be the 172nd 79 pesos, which makes it difficult to send a compelling reason for someone’s business headquarters.

 

At the time, November 10 arrived, my hot water tank in the wrong place yet again, leaked again, but a little. The most important consequence is that the drops of water from the pilot is from time to time, so if you constantly check that you never know when your shower is hot or cold.

 

Neither Tubos HESA visited the new date for the procedure. The mediator PROFECO his computer and believe with the State of Mexico regional office, and again in the lead, which HESA was on strike. And once again I cried HESA and confirmed that business has been in normal operation, without a strike. Don Alvin, “Javier assured:” We will try to HESA serve once again and I hope that this time, the supervisor of the server process will have a word with him and tell him that there was no to strike. “More importantly, the arbitrator has decided on a fine 3000 pesos Tubos do not send a representative to this second meeting to raise.

 

I did not ask why the fine was so steep Tubos, just stunned, that was my ally be a substantial wage has been sounded for the bad guy get hurt, because he had no evidence of the procedure. “I think we should try to convince Tubos who share responsibility and it may be nice, it was to convince him to come to the table and recognize that you rely on the seller’s decision whether you will need HESA determined to buy a product. “Javier has treated me with great respect (for example, Don Alvin”) to give me advice, and as a pro-active in its approach to the issue. “Give them a little over a month to be served, just to be sure. How about December 15th? ”

 

On December 15th Engineer Octavio visited once, but not that of HESA. This time, PROFECO was a statement of the bailiff who HESA was indeed a strike, very strange, because there is no corresponding information on the Internet. “It may be that some employees of the company are striking and able to avoid this HESA as a means of judicial documents for any business to use” Javier suspects. PROFECO Only the delivery of documents is permitted PROFECO then my job to a friend in Mexico City to visit with HESA for papers was rejected.

 

I decided that was enough, and if I could straight up to a fine of 3,000 pesos Tubos, and buy a new brand would be the best alternative, at least with regard to finish my business PROFECO. I could continue to pursue HESA, but would the Court concluded, because the procedures PROFECO. We are up to 17 interrupted, you choose the plan is that in the meantime, I would like to visit Tubos accounting for a comparable product from another manufacturer, and since 2500 one peso.

 

Until finances PROFECO not save a great companion with a governmental branch, probably, or collections, or any part thereof may be applied to a comprehensive settlement within the framework of a negotiated solution. PROFECO not otherwise receive in the amount of the fine or the consumer. The paperwork, which reflects the imposition of a fine can, without any mention of the fine should be reworded. Literally, a branch of government does not know what the other branch.

 

I chose another brand, Delta, with specifications and a guarantee of six years, the net cost to me 9800. 25 pesos. Three years ago I paid 11,736 pesos for heating hot water HESA. Given the rate of inflation in Mexico, I’m not that bad. Although I Tubos y Conexiones released from any obligation to me, I have the right to proceed to trial against HESA preserved for all damages, including the cost of my new boiler Delta. Economically feasible or not, is how I go.

 

PROFECO has its limitations, particularly its power to compel and enforce the resolutions are limited in this type of consumer disputes. However, it is an important and valuable alternative means of settling disputes, provide attractive for a number of reasons:

 

1) The system runs faster, much more than that to which we are accustomed to Germany and the United States;

 

2) There is no cost to the consumer;

 

3) The staff is helpful, obviously well educated, and prepare legal advice or quasi-legal … they are not necessarily good advice, it is nevertheless useful for foreigners, often with a limited network also give advice on the situation;

 

4) The mediators appear to have good skills in mediation and sincerely motivated to bring the parties together in order to reach resolutions in a cost effective and meaningful.

State consumer board supports new rebate law

August 16th, 2010

State consumer board supports new rebate law
ALBANY — The New York State Consumer Protection Board supports the a new law providing consumers with information about rebate offers made by manufacturers and retailers.

Read more on The Goshen Chronicle

What level of government is responsible for dealing with the problem of consumer protection rights??

August 8th, 2010

I have to present a project. Pls tell me the answers to these questions: -1) What is the level of government is responsible for handling the problem of human rights protection of consumers, 2) What government policy should deal with this problem ? 3) What are advantages and disadvantages of this policy? 4) How can it be improved? 5) If this policy should be replaced, and why? Pls tell me the answer to these questions. I live in !!!!!!!!! Thank you in advance Delhi.Vielen

Travis Plunkett

August 3rd, 2010

Consumer Protection

Image taken on 2009-02-04 13:40:36 by Center for American Progress Action Fund.

Tarlow, Breed, Hart & Rodgers Outlines the Potential Impact of Upcoming Massachusetts Sjc Ruling on the State?s Consumer Protection Act

July 30th, 2010

 

DATELINE: Boston, MA …

A forthcoming decision by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) has the potential to be a very important event not only for consumers but also for the Community as a whole according to Attorney Lee M. Holland of Tarlow, race, Rodgers & Hart.

 

In Iannacchino Joseph and others v. Ford Motor Company and others to the extent an applicant to obtain a damage or loss must be detected before us on the courts to relieve the allegedly abusive and deceptive practices under Chapter 93A. Once this hurdle, they, for example, they can access the Charter provisions powerful triple damages. Therefore, the answer is important, which does business in Massachusetts and may be the face of such claims.

 

The case, in a word.

In the case Iannacchino, the applicants have requested that the defendant has breached the Act on consumer protection in order to remind them not to fix certain vehicles, which have a defect in the locking mechanisms of the door, which allows consumers to reduce the risk of serious injury or death. The respondents rated the locking mechanisms and decided not to initiate a recall.

 

The Superior Court granted the motion of the accused to dismiss the claims of applicants because the applicant was able to use the allegedly defective vehicles, and had no direct personal or economic injury suffered as a result of the alleged defect . In call waiting, CMP, the challenge, the plaintiffs, the trial court dismissing the application.

 

Advantages and disadvantages.

he finds in Holland, but many competitors are there strong arguments for the CMP to be tested. On the one hand, support, consumer organizations, the ultimate consumer safety must be improved, and it would be wrong to demand the right to interpret existing consumer to physical damage as a condition of a right of institute, where they can find there is a flaw, which is reasonably high risk of harm consumers.

 

Conversely, one can argue that consumers are adequately protected by existing law, but even more by the demand for improved security. The producers have an economic interest in the achievement of safe, where the market requires, as in the automotive consumer industry. Dispute over a security breach said did not result in physical injury consumes resources that could require manufacturers in research and product development to invest in order to hinder the efforts of security.

 

wider societal costs may also be present. For example, an unexpected increase legal risks that companies face doing business in the community could function as a barrier to economic growth. . . . ”

 

Stay tuned for the sentence.

It is true that the plaintiff Iannacchino could use their cars and have no direct harm. Suppose there is a shortage of door latches, but it is also true that an applicant for an increased risk of injury every time they go for a drive against Iannacchino. Does that mean a higher risk, they can sue under the Act on Consumer Protection State? Stay tuned for the SJC decision is expected in June 2008.

 

Tarlow, race, Hart & Rodgers, P. C.

Founded in 1991, Tarlow, Breed, Hart & Rodgers, PC, committed to quality, comprehensive legal services to their customers. With a breadth and depth of experience and perspective, which usually offers only to large firms, Tarlow, race, Hart & Rodgers, PC sophisticated legal advice to entrepreneurs, businesses, individuals, families and institutions.

His areas of expertise include process and arbitration, corporate law, labor law, mergers and acquisitions, estate planning, tax, real estate, bankruptcy and municipal law.

 

The expertise and collegiality of the firm, more than fifty members, staff and support staff has always resulted in the establishment of lasting relationships of trust.

 

The offices of Tarlow, race, Hart & Rodgers, PC, 101 Huntington Avenue, Prudential Center, Boston, MA Located 02199th For more information or to schedule a consultation, please call 1-617-218 – 2000, e-mail: info @ tbhr law. com or visit www. tbhr law. com.

 

 

E-commerce and Legislation: Consumer Protection and Digital Signatures

July 26th, 2010

Consumer protection is a political issue for a country to consider the adoption of unified ETA. To understand the issue, it is important to have some familiarity with the Federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (E-Sign), most in the first rule become effective October 2000th 15 USC § § 7001 – 7031. E-Sign is similar to Unified ETA in many ways and has been adopted to address the lack of uniformity in state laws and ensure the enforceability of electronic signatures and contracts in interstate commerce, regardless of the fact that each state adopted unified ETA. Seeking to preserve the rights of states, E-Sign contains complex and narrow “exemption to preemption” provision, states can opt-out of much of the E-Sign. States may opt-out by the adoption of the single version of the Federal Act or other procedures and requirements that are in line with e-sign. 15 USC § 7002 (a). Oregon has reduced the status carefully worked within this exemption by adopting the single unified version of the ETA and additional provisions in accordance with the E-Sign.
A major difference between E-Sign and ETA is that E-Sign includes detailed rules on consumer protection is not alone in the ETA. See 15 USC § 7001 (c). Because of the preemption exemption mentioned above, a state of the adoption of the uniform version of the ETA Unified probably anticipate the E-Sign of Consumer Protection. The Oregon legislature has adopted a policy choice to the consumer protection provisions of the E-Sign Act in Oregon. Consequently, 2001 Oregon Laws, Chapter 535, Section 24 contains provisions to protect consumers in e-Sign is no change. These provisions include specific criteria that can be satisfied by electronic means, as well as various statutory requirements of notice and excludes the use of electronic notices for actions such as cessation of utilities or eviction from housing must be respected.
It should be noted that ETA uniform contain more general requirements relating to non-representation of electronic documents to be. Under § 8, if certain statutory information must be provided, sent or given in writing, an electronic document must be adapted to meet the retention by the recipient at the time of receipt of this law. Capable of retention is the ability of the recipient to print or store the electronic record. The specific requirements of their format or presentation in an appropriate law must be respected in the electronic record. If the sender inhibits the ability of a recipient to store or print an electronic record, that record is not enforceable against the recipient.
In discussing “electronic signatures” Note the important distinction between this term and “digital signatures”. As already mentioned, no electronic noise, symbol or process can electronic signatures, if necessary intent to sign is present. Digital signatures, on the other hand, offer specific forms of electronic signature technology that offers additional benefits, such as authentication and encryption. Documents prepared with digital signatures provide greater certainty about the identity of the signer and are difficult to alter and forge.
Before the passage of 2001 Oregon Laws, chapter 535, Oregon had a law on electronic signatures, which deals with enforceability thin electronic and digital signatures and provide an infrastructure for registering companies, digital signatures (Certification Authorities) approved the subject. § § 31-36 significantly change from the 2001 Oregon Laws, Chapter 535 Oregon Signature Act renaming the Digital Signature Act and compliance with federal law. Changing the signature law limits the application of digital signatures and makes appropriate reference to the newly adopted provisions of the Unified ETA, which governs the enforceability of electronic signature.

Consumer Protection Law

July 21st, 2010

The customer is king. Gone are the days when companies are set by mature customers quality products and friendly services in exchange for money. If you are a victim of such an action, you can take legal action against the company. Many consumers each year, the financial and emotional stress suffered by misleading actions of the company. You can also hold a company liable if their product or service you have pain in any way. There is nothing to feel helpless, because the consumer is right there to protect you. If you have been deceived, and you think you do not defend, you are absolutely wrong. For an individual, it seems that he or she is definitely losing the battle against a company. Eating an appeal against such a strong opponent, an idea wired. But it is possible for laws to protect consumers. A lawyer experienced in consumer protection can help you fight for your rights. If you encounter any kind of loss or damage to a product due to the negligence of the manufacturer, distributor or retailer, your lawyer will help you get compensation for your losses. Counsel to manage knowledge and experience to you. He will also know how the law applies to your case. Consumers are more at risk today with business opportunities in constant growth, different media including the Internet. It is easier for consumer victims of fraudulent transactions, false advertising, fraud credit cards and much more. If you’re desperate the situation together and think it’s probably because you do not know your rights. Consumer Protection Act protects consumers’ rights and ensure that they receive compensation for fraud or negligence. Among the areas of consumer protection legislation includes: * Purchase * problem * Travel Protection identity theft and fraud * hotel defective goods * * Pyramid schemes and conflicts contractor subcontractor credit * and banking problems, fraud or negligence of the product or service lead to frustration for consumers, because they invest much time and energy to make those responsible need justice. Submitting your application may be expensive at first glance. However, this small effort will ensure that you receive compensation for your loss. attorney’s fees can be high, even sound. In such cases, contact with lawyers who charge the promise that if they win the case. They must offer a certain percentage of compensation to the consumer protection lawyer if you win the case. In addition, for major works on paper and complex legal issues are not your cup of tea. Sun hire an experienced lawyer is a wise decision in all respects.